The important standardized beta coefficient (? = –0

The important standardized beta coefficient (? = –0

The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.

The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.

The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.

Which offered brand new hypothesis that rationalist epistemology tends into a good reduced amount of engagement towards the Wedding subscale in addition to constructivist epistemology tends towards the an increased standard of involvement to the Wedding subscale

For this reason, epistemology (rationalist against. constructivist) are discovered to be a life threatening predictor out of cures layout. Particularly, by far the most strong results provide provisional assistance for the belief one to there are certain differences in the private sorts of the fresh new counselor depending on the therapists’ epistemic assumptions. Alot more especially, the current study unearthed that therapists with rationalist epistemologies tended to the a great deal more range, a lesser amount of wedding, an effective narrower appeal, and an elevated level of believe within their training which have members, while, the latest constructivist epistemology tended into with a heightened degree of closeness, a heightened amount of involvement, a broader interest, and more sense of humor in their medication classes. Additionally, discover certain assistance into perception one to therapists with constructivist epistemologies tend to your the newest recommendations away from liberty instead of firmness when you look at the the therapy layout; although not it was maybe not a really solid shopping for in the present studies.

These types of results are helpful in relation to new probably intrinsic differences handled by the rationalist as opposed to constructivist epistemologies based on treatment layout. So much more particularly, latest results hold the understanding one cognitive-behavioral treatment citas en línea en la universidad, which depict an educated portrayal of one’s rationalist epistemology, look after an enthusiastic “active-directive” and you will health-related way of treatment (Granvold, 1988) that have certain requires regularly bundle the course of your example (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).

Theory dos-Epistemology Affects the fresh Therapeutic Relationship

With respect to the 2nd theory-practitioners having rationalist epistemologies will score higher to the Activity and you can Objective subscales minimizing towards the Thread subscale versus constructivist epistemologies-some other multiple linear regression design try conducted to determine should your exact same predictor varying (counselor epistemology) carry out dictate therapists’ critiques of your standard variables (performing alliance) centered on therapists’ millions of around three subscales-Task, Purpose, and you can Bond.

admin
ارسال دیدگاه